Critical Response Journal #1
Firstly I want to admit how overwhelming this chapter was for me. I don’t think I have ever read so many pages on women, women’s history, feminism, or any other related topics in any of my former textbooks, not even mentioning a single setting. This chapter has opened my eyes to a whole entire section of history and society that I feel that I have either been sheltered from or have basically ignored for most of my life.
The primary area that stood out for me during the reading was what I considered an elongated section of feminism and women history, but in reality was must more of a brief synopsis of feminism movements. I became suddenly aware of the lack of women’s history in today’s public education. Yes, there is a women’s history month and my AP US History teacher did make us write an essay on women’s role in society pre, during, and post the civil war (which by the way ending up being an official AP US History test question that year, so cheers to the test makers), but there really isn’t a significant amount of time devoted to women. Events that received at least a full paragraph in this chapter alone would have been only a single sentence in my high school textbooks. Susan B. Anthony, Stanton, and other nominal women figures were mentioned during my courses but never discussed. There should be more opportunities for women’s history courses to be held at public high schools. The number of teenage feminist would greatly increase if such programs were made available to more if not all schools.
A problem that I had with the text occurred when during one of the readings the author wrote, “She cannot be anti-abortion and an advocate of feminism” (pg. 44). I strongly disagree with this statement. I understand the thought process that the right to an abortion is part of a woman’s right to sexual freedom and sexual health care. So by saying that one is against abortions then one is against part of women’s sexual freedom, and a good section of feminism. On the other side, if a women is extremely religious could she not also see abortion as an act of murder and therefore not a part of women’s sexual rights? This hypothetical, religious woman could still share many other feminist ideals such as equality in the work place, home, and society. I don’t see why not being for abortion should make one not a feminist.
As I stated before, this chapter was loaded with information that I could probably discuss in great detail till the point that either my fingers corrode or whoever reads this falls asleep. I believe that I am starting to see a different light about Women’s Studies and feminism. Hopefully the rest of this course and textbook will continue to impress me with the interesting history, facts, and stories that are all surprisingly new and different for me.